If anyone is capable of diffusing the tension between actors and AI, Kerry Washington is a good candidate. Washington won over legions of fans with her breakout role in โ€œScandal,โ€ and since then, sheโ€™s put her star power to good use. Sheโ€™s produced documentaries; sheโ€™s written a book; sheโ€™s started a school; sheโ€™s served on Presidential committees; and sheโ€™s been a champion for workersโ€™ rights. Now, Washington is grappling with how actors and their representatives could useโ€”or misuseโ€”AI in the coming years.

Washington joined Vermillio CEO Dan Neely and Worth Media chairman Jim McCann at Techonomy 23: The Promise and Peril of AI in Orlando, Florida. Their talk, called โ€œThe Next Creative Frontier,โ€ focused on the potential applications of AI in the entertainment space. This topic was an enormous point of contention during the recently concluded SAG-AFTRA strike.

Consent and authenticity

Washington and Neely have been working together on a proof-of-concept AI with her likeness. Her approval, she argued, is what makes the project respectable. To illustrate her point, she reminded the audience that her โ€œScandalโ€ persona, Olivia Pope, was famous for carrying stylish Prada handbags.

โ€œNow you can go down to Canal Street [in New York City] and get a โ€˜Prada purseโ€™ for a lot less than what a real Prada purse costs,โ€ she said. โ€œBut when you go to the store on 5th Avenue, or Milan, or in Paris, and you buy a Prada bag, it comes with a certificate of authentication. Thatโ€™s your proof that itโ€™s real, and that what you spent your money on was worthwhile.

โ€œItโ€™s that idea of proving that itโ€™s worthwhile; proving that itโ€™s true; proving that I gave my consent โ€ฆ that this AI thatโ€™s been created utilizing my talent is something that I gave permission for; and that I should be compensated for it.โ€

While Washington is a proponent of AI, sheโ€™s also aware that the technology could amplify existing injustices. AI algorithms are inherently a reflection of the people who develop them, for good or ill.

โ€œItโ€™s the Wild West,โ€ she said. โ€œItโ€™s important to be in the conversation. You want to have a seat at the table. A lot of what people are nervous about in AI is the bias that gets built in, because of how data is collected, because of who is in charge of these algorithms and designing the technology.

โ€œThatโ€™s why consent is so important. Some version of AI may build versions of me out in the world that I donโ€™t agree with, that I think factor in a level of bias about who women are, or who Black women are, thatโ€™s not good for those communities.โ€

Ultimately, Washington said, she wants AI to come, โ€œfrom a more inclusive, balanced, diverse perspective.โ€

 

 

Kerry Washingtonโ€™s AI proof-of-concept

The most striking part of the talk came later, when Washington showed off the AI project that she and Neely had been working on. By analyzing Washingtonโ€™s voice, an AI was able to spontaneously generate a personalized message for a fan whoโ€™d bought her book.

The inspiration for the project, Washington said, came during the book tour for her 2023 memoir, Thicker Than Water. She loved meeting fans all around the United States and the United Kingdom, but realized that many of her fans donโ€™t live anywhere near the tour stops.

Kerry Washington's AI book appโ€œHow do we get somebody in the digital space, in the digital landscape, to feel like they have access to me personally?โ€ she asked. โ€œWhat can I do on AI to get people to feel like they get a signed copy of the book, even though they canโ€™t necessarily get the signed copy and meet me?โ€

The answer was a proof-of-concept app that Neely developed using Vermillioโ€™s generative AI technology. On the top, thereโ€™s a Thicker Than Water logo, and on the bottom, one of Washingtonโ€™s headshots. In-between, thereโ€™s a simple drop-down menu. To generate a voice clip from Washingtonโ€™s AI persona, users simply provide a name, a special occasion for the message, and whether or not theyโ€™ve bought a copy of the book.

For the demo, Neely proposed sending a message to a woman named Shamika, โ€œjust because,โ€ who does own a copy of the book. Six seconds later, the app displayed an image of the bookโ€™s cover, with a playable audio file beneath it.

โ€œWell hello, Shamika,โ€ says Washingtonโ€™s digital doppelganger. โ€œI hope all is well with you and your family. Your support means the world to me. Sharing my story with you is so meaningful to me, in a lot of ways. Itโ€™s a part of my journey to freedom. Thank you for hearing me. Kerry.โ€

โ€œI never said that, guys!โ€ the real Washington responded. โ€œThatโ€™s incredible.โ€

To be fair, the message sounds a bit uncanny. The words donโ€™t flow together as naturally as they would with a human speaker. The cadence of each phrase doesnโ€™t match the text, and there are some jarring pauses between sentences. We also donโ€™t know exactly how this message differs from other greetings that the app could have generated.

Still, as a proof-of-concept, it does what Neely and Washington wanted it to do. The app demonstrates that actors can leverage AI in a way thatโ€™s both creative and ethical.

โ€œThis is where consent, and approval, and compensation is everything,โ€ Washington said. โ€œI didnโ€™t say it, but I gave permission to be in partnership, [so] itโ€™s coming from me, and I stand by it.โ€