Years, to investors, occasionally
take on ominous overtones. Say 1987, and thoughts turn to the stock market
crash; ’94, the Mexican peso crisis; ’97, the Asian financial crisis; 2000, the
dot-com bubble burst. Those watching the widespread free fall in global
markets and asset prices in the weeks after May 11 could be excused for
wondering if 2006 would soon to become yet another baleful benchmark.
By the end of that month, the S&P 500 had declined 3.1
percent after thrashing about violently for two weeks. Riskier markets were
savaged as startled investors sought to salvage some of their gains. The flight
to quality, triggered by rising interest rates in the G3 (dollar, euro and yen)
currencies, pummeled emerging-market assets in particular. Morgan Stanley’s
emerging-markets index, which had been up almost 20 percent for the year at the
beginning of May, saw those gains erased and fell another 6 points by May 17.
Foreign investors’ losses were exacerbated by sliding currencies. The Brazilian
real, for example, fell more than 10 percent against the dollar that month.
Despite the upheaval, emerging-market debt investors and
strategists remain cautiously bullish. Many of these countries, they say, have
strong GDP and employment growth, and inflation is largely under control. One
positive indication of their longer-term prospects is the emergence and success
of what is, essentially, a new asset class: debt denominated in their local
currencies. This is less exposed (from the issuers’ point of view) to the
vicissitudes of G3 currency markets and is a bellwether of growing investor
confidence in key emerging markets.
"I am bullish on the asset class over the medium and long
term," says Francis Beddington, London-based head of research for Central,
Eastern Europe, the Middle East and Africa at Standard Bank. "We see faster
growth in these countries compared with the core [developed countries], and we
will continue to do so."
Countries that have pursued successful fiscal and monetary
reform are the most promising. "We fundamentally believe the outlook for local
debt is good, and that really is a function of rate-cutting cycles around the
emerging-market universe, particularly in countries like Brazil and Mexico,"
says Edwin Gutierrez, London-based portfolio manager in emerging-market debt at
Aberdeen Asset Management.
Tequila Hangovers One of the concerns voiced in May was that the emerging
markets, after three years of double-digit growth, could be teetering on the
edge of another widespread debt crisis of the sort that erased billions in
investor capital in the mid and late 1990s. But the pressures that precipitated
those crises are largely absent today.
AHEAD OF THE HERD
5-year average
annual GDP growth | Country | Percent, 2000-2004 | China | 8.52 | Russia | 6.84 | India | 5.74 | Korea | 5.40 | Thailand | 5.06 | Hong Kong SAR | 4.78 | Indonesia | 4.62 | Turkey | 4.34 | Philippines | 4.26 | Singapore | 4.12 | Average World GDP Growth | 3.84 | Source: Pimco; International Monetary Fund, World Economic
Outlook Database, April 2005. | To see why, a bit of history is in order. Many of the
emerging-market economies pursued expansionary fiscal and monetary policies in
the 1980s and endured falling reserves, high inflation and overvalued
currencies. Reforms in the 1990s—including privatization programs, better
banking oversight, anti-inflationary monetary polices, financial market and
trade liberalization and more responsible fiscal behavior—stabilized many of the
leading economies in Latin America and Asia. But many who sought to control
prices by pegging their currencies to the dollar courted trouble. The
pegs resulted in the currencies becoming overvalued, and they eventually
collapsed under the weight of speculative attacks. Most emerging-market debt was
denominated in dollars, yen or one of the European currencies (since few
investors were willing to take two exposures: to the fortunes of the issuer
itself and to the strength of its currency), and the devaluations of the local
currencies made servicing the foreign currency debt prohibitively expensive.
Defaults ensued—in Mexico in late 1994 (the knock-on effect this had on other
Latin debt was known among traders as the "tequila effect"), throughout Asia in
1997 and in Russia in 1998.The aftermath, though extremely painful for citizens of the
countries themselves, as well as for their foreign investors, was cathartic.
"When these countries went from a pegged exchange rate to a floating exchange
rate, these were dramatic events, and some countries defaulted. But once that
happens and the currency can now move and adjust, the country is much more
flexible and is able to undertake reforms it might not have been able to do in
the past," explains John Peta, Boston-based emerging markets portfolio manager
with Standish Mellon Asset Management. In particular, the governments were now freed from the need to
spend their reserves trying to shore up their pegs. They could pursue more
rational, independent monetary policies. "For the most part, they are putting
those reserves in the bank and either paying down debt or not issuing as much
debt," Peta says. "It is the debt-to-GDP ratios that the rating agencies look
at, so the credit ratings have been improving on emerging-market countries."
The change has been dramatic: Roughly 40 percent of the JPMorgan Emerging Bond
Index is now rated investment grade, whereas a decade ago only 3 percent could
make such a boast.
|