Such was the case with Steve, an entrepreneur in Florida who built two
successful businesses. He remembers a defining moment of his “retirement” at age
41. Steve stepped back from his day-to-day life running a business when his twin
children were in the first grade. Without a 40-plus-hour work week to anchor his
schedule, he felt lost. “The weekend would come and I would wonder how I could
enjoy it when I didn’t work all week,” he says. “What was so special about
Friday night?”Many first generation retirees report feeling rudderless and without purpose:
“Without my business, what is so special about me?” Hughes says the key to
maintaining one’s post-retirement identity and esteem is to view succession as
“an asset allocation decision, rather than a sacred trust.” By doing so, the
business founder can make decisions without as much emotional baggage, and be
better able to let go of the business and move on successfully to the next phase
of his or her life. | I never wanted my children in my business because they, and
everyone else, would be comparing their performance to mine.” | Steve believed he embraced this philosophy, but withdrawing from the business
was harder than he expected. Although he did not see his business as part of his
family legacy, the loss of the tangible evidence of his drive and his success
required a new way of thinking. “I had always looked at the business more as a
tool to create a liquidity event,” he says. “I wasn’t so attached to it that I
couldn’t sell it.”Once the business was gone, however, not only did he have to fill his
time, but he worried about instilling a work ethic in his children when he did
not have a job himself. “It was a huge challenge to find meaning and fulfillment
in nonfinancial activities,” he says. Though Steve says he realized early in his career that he wanted the business to
work for him, rather than the other way around, the transition to a life of
leisure was difficult. “It was about a year’s transition,” he says, “and I
didn’t enjoy it the way I could have because there was some anxiety.”
Saved from Themselves Now that the twins are young adults and are preparing to enter the work world,
his apprehension has shifted to issues of transferring his fortune. “It’s the
classic case of, ‘If I give my kids too much money, am I going to ruin them,’
and ‘How much is too much?’ ” Steve has overcome this particular fear by
informing his children that he and his wife are bequeathing much of their wealth
to a family foundation. His children have been involved in setting up the
foundation, and in the decisions about how to allocate the money.
The couple have also introduced their children to budgets—even requiring them to
account for their spending each week while they were in college, and for any
withdrawals they might wish to make from their modest trust funds. They also
required the children to review their trusts and keep up with the investments,
and to take a role in vital decisions of the family foundation. Because of this,
his daughter, Tina, says she and her brother are prepared to make their own
marks in the world. “If I receive an inheritance, I don’t think I’ll live off
it,” she says. “I’d like to start my own business, ideally.”
In preparing their children to be financially responsible heirs who would
eventually control their own assets and lives, Steve and his wife enabled both
generations to avoid some of the successional pitfalls and intergenerational
mistrust that befell the Liautauds. In the end, Hughes says, the issues the
first generation face center on trust. “The first generation must find a way to
trust the second, and allow it to continue the family legacy by being productive
and valued by all family members. If the first generation creates a nurturing
environment, then a family’s financial capital will continue to grow.”
Illustration by Jonathan Barkat. Back to Main Article: Wrestling for Control of the Business
|