Estate-plan disasters that shatter families and squander wealth make
headlines all too often. While most people watch these melodramas with a certain
voyeuristic glee, few glean any lessons for avoiding them in their own estates.
To that end, Worth
reviewed some of the notable estate-planning debacles of the past few years and
asked experts to weigh in with advice on how others can avoid similar
fates. The Binger Estate: Undue Pressure?
The children and grandchildren of James Binger, a former Honeywell chairman
and prominent philanthropist, were fine with his plan to leave the bulk of his
cash reserves, about $200 million, to his Robina Foundation. They also faced the
$112 million estate tax bill, which will provide 14 percent of Minnesota’s
projected budget surplus for 2006–07, with equanimity. Though geographically
dispersed, the Bingers are a close-knit clan, well known in their home state of
Minnesota as the philanthropic descendants of William L. McKnight, founder of 3M
and the McKnight Foundation. (Binger married McKnight’s daughter, Virginia, who
died in 2002.)
However, they were angry enough to litigate over Binger’s
decision, two months before his death in November 2004, to bequeath $50 million
to his longtime family office manager and, by most accounts, girlfriend, Jane
Mauer. Mauer is likely to testify that she and Binger had a relationship before
his wife’s death. His heirs contend that he had earmarked the money for the
foundation, and argue that Mauer exerted undue pressure on Binger. Mauer’s
affidavit claims Binger loved her, an assertion witnesses supported at
trial.
In a case that is expected to drag on until September 2007, the heirs
will bring up the fact that Binger hired a new lawyer only a year before his
death and that he was taking a prescription for moderate-stage
Alzheimer’s.
Lesson learned: In an ideal world, Binger would have had a
family meeting–without Mauer present—to explain his intentions. In reality,
notes Richard Horwood, a trust and estate lawyer with Horwood Marcus & Berk
Chartered in Chicago, “Many clients shy away from having a family meeting for
something like this because it could be so confrontational.” Nevertheless, he
adds, when the head of a family displays a radical change of mind about the
terms of a will, a nasty court battle is practically inevitable unless he has
left behind a clear trail of evidence that he was acting of his own volition,
with many witnesses able to testify to his competence. Binger should have
outlined all of his reasons for doing what he did in a letter or videotape to
the family for posthumous viewing, Horwood says. Ideally, there should be
evidence that he discussed the new terms with his lawyers without the new
beneficiary present. He should have prepared and signed his new will without her
around. And, Horwood concludes, “bringing in a new lawyer is often a red
flag.”
The Brando Estate: No Man Is an Island
Marlon Brando’s son, Teihotu, 43, is the sole inhabitant of Tetiaroa, the
South Pacific paradise his father bought in 1966, vowing to preserve the oasis
of pristine white sands and thatch-roof huts. In 1982, Brando placed Tetiaroa in
a trust to ensure that his wishes would be carried out. But instead of becoming
a second-generation owner of the island, last year Teihotu Brando became simply
the caretaker, employed by luxury resort developer Richard Bailey, who plans to
build the Brando, a resort of 30 opulent villas, on Tetiaroa. His father’s
convoluted estate planning may be Teihotu’s downfall.
After Brando’s
daughter, Cheyenne, committed suicide in Tahiti in 1995, he never returned to
French Polynesia; the tiny, rustic hotel Brando had established on Tetiaroa fell
into disrepair. In 2002, he drafted a new will and trust agreement that failed
to provide specific plans for Tetiaroa. Two years later, he ousted his business
manager, Jo An Corrales, and long-standing secretary, Alice Marchak, as
executors of his estate—with no explanation. He died two weeks later, and
Tetiaroa, Brando’s tropical escape, was doomed.
Without explicit
instructions, the new executors of Brando’s estate were bound by a fiduciary
duty to reap the island’s maximum cash value for Brando’s nine surviving
children. They sold the development rights to Bailey under a 60-year lease; he
was reportedly the only party interested enough to offer a proposal. While he
has vowed to build an eco-friendly resort in line with Brando’s wishes, the
actor’s former executors are livid. “The estate broke a promise Marlon made to
the Polynesian people,” Corrales told the Los Angeles Times in 2005.
|