subscribe
back issues
reprints
contact us
Wealth in Perspective
Wealth Management
Thought Leaders
Money and Meaning
Passion Investments
Wealth Management Sourcebook
Multifamily Office 2008
Previous Issues Index
/ Home / Editorial / Wealth Management / Estate Planning /
Best Practices: Estates
Guarded Optimism
Dan Weil
06/01/2007

What a difference an election cycle makes. Investors can rest uneasy that the federal estate tax-free year of 2010 will prove an anomaly, and return with a vengeance in 2011. But while Congress and the White House bide their time over whether or not to raise the $1 million exemption set to reappear in four years, state legislators across the country continue to debate local "death" taxes. State estate taxes often prove windfalls for treasuries across the country.

Consider Susan Buffett’s estate, which closed in February. Beyond the $2.62 billion she left to charity when she died in July 2004, she also bequeathed an estate of $59 million to family and friends. Her final death tax bill? $110.4 million to federal, state and countygovernments.

How’s that? Buffett’s assets were tied up in stock in Berkshire Hathaway. The estate sold the shares to fulfill the bequests, then sold more shares to pay property taxes. Following that, the capital gains also became subject to additional taxes, for which the estate had to sell even more stock—subject, of course, to taxes.

Of the total taxes on the estate, $75.5 million went to the federal government, $29.7 million to the state of Nebraska and $5.2 million to Douglas County. In an average year, Nebraska collects roughly $20 million in inheritance taxes. Buffett’s death helped swell the 2005 total to $64.1 million. These potential windfalls spur many states to impose their own estate or inheritance taxes. The unsubtle difference between the two types of levies is that one is imposed on an estate itself, the other charged to its beneficiaries at rates that vary according to their relationship to the deceased.

"Lawmakers are addicted to the revenue," says Curtis Dubay, an economist at the Tax Foundation, a Washington, D.C., think tank. "They don’t want to see a source fall to the wayside. It’s an easy source of revenue, because you can claim it only hits the rich, so it’s politically expedient."

Across the country, state death taxes typically run from 5 percent up to 19 percent of all assets beyond the usual exemptions, generally $1 million or $2 million. The current federal estate tax sits at 45 percent through 2009, and will revert to 55 percent in 2011.

Today 27 states impose no death taxes. Taxpayers may assume that a Democratic majority in the state legislature will lead to added levies, but this assumption may be invalid. For the foreseeable future, certainly well past 2011, any state is apt to scramble to gain revenue lost since 2001, when the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act began phasing out the state credit that estate-tax payers could write off on their federal returns. (This came to be known as the "pick-up tax.") The credit meant that estate-tax payers paid the federal rate and the state received a share of it. In 2005, the IRS changed the state credit into a deduction; it is scheduled to last until 2010, and revert back to a credit in 2011.

1 | 2 | 3 | >>
Printer Friendly Version  Email a Friend


Related Articles
» Tax Americana
» Insurance Conundrum
» Overseas Entanglements
» Mind the Gaps
» A Family Way
 
Get a FREE ISSUE and a FREE GIFT

Simply fill out this form to receive a complimentary issue of Worth and a FREE gift ("The top 25 Questions for Your Private Banker"). If you like the magazine, you’ll pay just $36 for 5 more issues (6 in all). If it’s not for you, you can return your invoice marked "cancel", and owe nothing. The FREE issue and FREE gift are yours to keep.
Name
Address
Canadian orders click here
International orders click here

Unsubscribe from subscription emails click here
 



Family Office Wealth Conference