Over recent months, unprecedented
and enormous losses resulting from the subprime mortgage meltdown have focused
increased scrutiny on hedge funds, the unregulated investment pools that have
become increasingly popular as a result of their above-market returns. According
to a report last August by the law firm Morrison & Foerster, of the roughly
9,000 hedge funds, which combined hold at least $1.7 trillion in assets, an
estimated 2,000 are perceived as vulnerable to subprime market woes. Fears that
the last to exit will suffer the greatest losses have in a few instances fueled
a "run on the bank," resulting in margin calls, forced sales and losses now
exceeding $1 billion.
This meltdown has already sparked a host of investigations and
lawsuits. Courts and arbitration panels will be asked to apportion losses and
determine whether they resulted from fraud and conflicts of interest or from
market risk.
The at-risk hedge funds invested heavily in highly leveraged
instruments such as credit default swaps, collateralized debt obligations and
collateralized mortgage obligations. According to media reports, the SEC is
investigating the way hedge funds valued these exotic instruments. The SEC is
also looking at the bond-rating agencies for awarding high ratings to bonds that
have since lost a large measure of their value and for failing to timely
downgrade ratings—in some instances not until after the bonds had collapsed.
The investigations focus on whether bond ratings were tainted by the large fees
the agencies received from issuers. If the ratings turn out to have been
influenced improperly, hedge funds, banks and pension funds that bought bonds in
reliance on the ratings are likely to have claims against the agencies.
The mortgage meltdown has also hit investors hard. Many
suffered losses in the millions. In the past, hedge fund investing was limited
to deca-millionaires and institutions that could afford the risks. In recent
years, however, hedge funds working with brokerage firms opened their doors to
retail customers by lowering their investment minimums to as little as $100,000.
Concerned about this trend, the National Association of Securities Dealers in
February 2003 warned brokers that they were obligated to make sure that their
clients understood and could withstand the risks before putting them into hedge
funds. Indeed, investors have started to bring claims alleging that their
brokers ignored the warning, failed to fully disclose the risks, and gave bad
advice because of a tangled web of conflicts of interest between the hedge funds
and the broker-dealers.
The hedge funds, in turn, have sued underwriters, issuers and
others involved in creating and selling subprime mortgage pools. For example, in
April, Bankers Life Insurance sued the underwriter, seller and servicer of
subprime mortgages it purchased in the secondary market, alleging that the
prospectus misrepresented and understated the risks of the investment and that
the defendants failed to disclose bad news as it unfolded. Bankers Life asserted
that the defendants failed to disclose that a large portion of the portfolio was
in default and had been denied insurance coverage, and that the trustee failed
to enforce its rights under the pooling-and-servicing agreement. Had this been
disclosed, Bankers Life alleges, it would never have purchased the mortgage
pools.
In anticipation of litigation, hedge funds with mortgage-based
losses have begun taking defensive measures. In July, two Bear Stearns hedge
funds that sustained considerable losses from subprime mortgages filed for
bankruptcy protection. In all likelihood, investors will assert claims against
the funds’ lenders for calling loans and selling collateral at fire-sale prices,
precipitating the funds’ collapse.
The case also has sparked a novel jurisdictional dispute. The
funds filed for bankruptcy protection in the Cayman Islands, where they were
incorporated, hoping that the Cayman court would be more debtor-friendly than
U.S. courts. However, U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge Burton Lifland in New York
recently denied a request by the funds’ trustees to recognize the Cayman Islands
proceeding. If the ruling stands, it will force the fund to refile its
bankruptcy in a U.S. court. This issue of first impression will be critical in
other cases because many hedge funds are incorporated in offshore jurisdictions
such as the Cayman Islands.
Those who invested in mortgage-backed securities directly or
through a hedge fund should scrutinize their portfolios and investments
carefully. We have entered a new chapter in the history of hedge fund investing
whose end has yet to be written.
David Gourevitch and Robert Y. Lewis are attorneys in New York
specializing in representing hedge funds, brokerage firms and investors in financial services litigation.
|