subscribe
back issues
reprints
contact us
Wealth in Perspective
Wealth Management
Thought Leaders
Money and Meaning
Passion Investments
Wealth Management Sourcebook
Multifamily Office 2008
Previous Issues Index
/ Home / Editorial / Thought Leaders / Politics & Policy /
Opportunities & Exposures: Policy
Green Fees
William G. Gale
04/01/2006

Few can doubt that the United States needs a better tax system. We need simple and consistent rules, adequate revenues to finance current government spending, equitable tax burdens across and within economic groups, and favorable incentives for productive activity. On top of these ongoing concerns, we will need to raise substantially more revenue in the future than we have in the past.

Achieving these goals sounds hopeless, but it is not. A little creativity in tax policy could go a long way. Many countries, for example, impose taxes on environmental pollution. Such taxes have the potential to make taxes simpler and fairer, and to significantly reduce the budget deficit. What’s more, they would lead to a healthier environment and might even make for better U.S. foreign policy, too.

Current tax laws not only miss huge opportunities to clean up the environment, they also actively lead to worse ecological outcomes. The first step should be to remove subsidies that damage the environment. Federal rules provide enormous tax preferences for oil, mining, timber and sport utility vehicles. These subsidies create incentives for overproduction of these goods, and they stifle incentives for development of better or cleaner technologies.

Even the mortgage interest deduction is at fault–it may encourage people to build larger primary residences. The deduction also applies to second homes, many of which are built in environmentally sensitive areas. A thorough cleaning of the tax code, with an eye toward environmentally damaging subsidies, could generate billions of dollars a year in added revenue.

Easy Being Green
We can be more ambitious still. When people or firms create pollution, they are imposing costs on others. In economics, it is well established that those agents should pay the full costs of their activities. One way to do this is to require polluters to pay taxes on their emissions.

Pollution taxes can be more effective and flexible than many forms of regulation because they give incentives to improve efficiency and environmental quality. They also allow firms to make cost-effective emission reductions where it makes economic sense–or to pay the tax if not. These taxes also stimulate innovation for better pollution control methods.

A broad tax on the carbon content of fossil fuels, for example, would make those who produce or consume products that contribute to global warming face the full costs of their actions and give them incentives to reduce those costs. The money generated could be used for some combination of simplifying and reducing other taxes, paying down the deficit and financing appropriate spending. An important benefit would be reducing our dependence on foreign oil–and the political problems that creates–by encouraging the development of cleaner technologies.

1 | 2 | >>
Printer Friendly Version  Email a Friend
 
Get a FREE ISSUE and a FREE GIFT

Simply fill out this form to receive a complimentary issue of Worth and a FREE gift ("The top 25 Questions for Your Private Banker"). If you like the magazine, you’ll pay just $36 for 5 more issues (6 in all). If it’s not for you, you can return your invoice marked "cancel", and owe nothing. The FREE issue and FREE gift are yours to keep.
Name
Address
Canadian orders click here
International orders click here

Unsubscribe from subscription emails click here
 



Family Office Wealth Conference