![]() |
|||
| Best Practices: Family | |||
| Unrecognized Unions
Jill Duman 03/01/2008 |
|||
In your 20s, "living together" means sharing a futon and possibly an impressive collection of music. You might lose your favorite CDs if the relationship ends, but no significant assets. However, more-established couples who live together without marriage risk losing far more. Couples of all ages are choosing to cohabit, with the Census Bureau reporting a 72 percent increase in the number of unmarried couples living together between 1990 and 2000. Indeed, many affluent couples prefer the apparent carefree simplicity of cohabitation over marriage. But attorneys and financial planners warn these individuals of a plethora of legal and tax ramifications that, if left unaddressed, could ruin their credit, finances and reputations. Furthermore, cohabitation may unintentionally threaten family wealth and harmony for those who have considerable assets held in family trusts or businesses. Unmarried couples living together face significant challenges when drafting estate plans. Consider one pair, clients of Lisa Padilla, a New York lawyer who specializes in financial and estate planning for nontraditional families. Don, a 55-year-old hedge fund manager, has a personal net worth of $50 million. For 25 years he has lived with Barbara, a 52-year-old photographer with no significant personal assets. Don also owns part interest with his brother and parents in a family limited partnership worth $25 million. Don sought Padilla’s advice in determining how to provide for Barbara in his estate while avoiding the legal and tax pitfalls unmarried couples often encounter. Don’s estate faces a $780,000 tax payment on the first $2 million after covering funeral and estate administration expenses. (This applies only if he avoids tapping the $1 million lifetime gift credit currently allowed by federal tax law.) His estate would also owe a 45 percent tax on the remaining amount over $2 million. And when Don dies, the IRS will factor in his interest in his family’s limited partnership when calculating estate taxes. Don’s estate planning dilemma underscores the complex issues that cohabitants should discuss and address. When one partner’s wealth far surpasses the other’s, each individual should consult a lawyer separately, says Ralph C. Brashier, a professor at the University of Memphis’ Humphreys School of Law and a contributing editor to the American Bar Association’s Probate and Property magazine. Such an arrangement becomes even more crucial if wealthy individuals want to preserve the bulk of their wealth for themselves, their children from prior relationships, or anyone besides their cohabiting partners. "There is no one-size-fits-all solution in asset planning for cohabiting couples," Brashier says. Beneficiary Trysts Anyone who wants to leave assets to a life partner must find creative ways to minimize estate taxes. One technique is to shift some of the wealthier partner’s assets to the other partner—although the IRS limits annual gifts to $12,000 before triggering federal gift taxes. "When you have an unmarried couple and you have a situation where all the assets are on one side of the ledger, it gets very, very difficult," says Sverre Roang, an attorney for Whyte Hirschboeck Dudek in Madison, Wis. "Often the game of tax planning for the unmarried couple is to figure out how to equalize the estate to avoid those ultimate estate taxes." Unmarried partners may name each other as beneficiaries for
retirement plans, although the survivor cannot roll over the benefits into his
or her own plan the way a spouse can. Many partners also rely on life insurance
to provide for each other as well as their family members. Russell P. Love, a
partner in the Atlanta offices of McKenna Long & Aldrich, describes naming
one another as life insurance beneficiaries—an all-around simple way of
transferring assets—as "the great equalizer."
"Children get cranky if they can’t get their trust," observes Diane Kelly, a CPA and certified management accountant in Carmel, Calif. Animosity may build, especially if the deceased individual tries to leave ownership in a family business to an unmarried companion. "Joe’s family is not going to be inclined to let Mary take Joe’s interest in the business—that’s just not going to happen," Padilla says. "They’re also not going to be too happy to give her money in order to purchase his interest to keep the business in the family." Families can avoid potential friction by talking about estate plans, says Debra Neiman, a Massachusetts-based financial advisor and a coauthor of Money Without Matrimony: The Unmarried Couple’s Guide to Financial Security. "Communication is your first line of defense," she says. Marking Boundaries Real estate typically represents the largest and often most complex asset cohabitants share. Wealth advisors recommend discussing details such as what names appear on the title, who owns the property, who bears responsibility for property liens, and what happens if the relationship dissolves or one partner dies. For couples purchasing a home together and intending that the survivor own the property after the first partner dies, both names should appear on the title as joint tenants with the right of survivorship.
Property ownership that is unclear provokes some of the more fractious breakups. "The call I get several times a week is ‘My girlfriend and I bought this house’ or ‘My boyfriend and I bought this house,’ " says Jared Laskin, an attorney in Southern California who specializes in cohabitation and palimony issues. Frequently the partner with poor credit is not listed on the title, yet helped pay the mortgage. Following a split-up, that person may not have a legal claim to the home. "Never, never put money or effort into a house that is not in your name, unless you have some written agreement," Laskin says. "People just go in blindly. Even if you trust your partner—and everyone trusts their partner until the relationship goes sour—he could get hit by a bus tomorrow, and if there’s no will, you have no interest in the house." Legal statutes specify the financial rights and
responsibilities of couples who are wed, which means "married people can’t pull
the same scams that unmarried people can," says Frederick Hertz, a lawyer in
Oakland, Calif., and a coauthor of Living Together: A Legal Guide for Unmarried Couples. |