subscribe
back issues
reprints
contact us
Wealth in Perspective
Wealth Management
Thought Leaders
Money and Meaning
Passion Investments
Wealth Management Sourcebook
Multifamily Office 2008
Previous Issues Index
/ Home / Editorial / Money & Meaning / Philanthropy /
Feature
Sound Counsel
John Egan
11/01/2007

To ensure that his philanthropic dollars are actually working to change lives, Pickens directs Carlin to track charitable gifts to make certain the money is accomplishing what the foundation intended. He also believes in squeezing as much as he can out of a donation—just as he would handle an energy investment. In the case of the $50 million contributions to the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center and UT Southwestern Medical Center, the gifts came with strings attached. The foundation offered the money with the caveat that the gifts will serve as the basis for special funds at the institutions, requiring that they grow to a total of $1 billion ($500 million each) within 25 years. If they do not achieve this goal, the two institutions must turn over the interest earned over the years to Pickens’ alma mater, Oklahoma State University. That sort of leverage forces fundraising officials to work harder and produce more results, according to Pickens.

"THE PROBLEM is that foundations get too big, unless you’re iron-fisted with the controls and you have an absolute road map of where the money goes.’’ —Tim Blixseth (Photograph by Andrew Geiger.)

"We hunt with a rifle. We don’t hunt with shotguns," he says. "We’d rather give meaningful gifts that are going to make a difference than a lot of little gifts. We want to make an impact."

Tim Blixseth: Going With Gut Feelings
Not everyone finds value in the team approach to philanthropy. In fact, some donors find too much advice a cumbersome layer of bureaucracy that detracts from the pleasure of spontaneous giving. "I really don’t consult with anybody," Blixseth says. "I just go with my gut feelings."

Ignoring the warnings of professionals on the dangers of not performing extensive pre-donation due diligence, Blixseth embraces a strictly informal vetting process. There were no lengthy meetings with advisors or formal sit-down sessions with consultants prior to his giving 40 acres to the Coachella Valley Unified School District in the desert community of Thermal, Calif., for a K-12 school. Blixseth’s gift also included an adjoining 276 acres of land for a community sports complex featuring a championship golf course designed by PGA legend Tom Weiskopf. Blixseth Group will build the golf course and operate it for 10 years, while pursuing donations for a foundation that eventually will run it for the school district.

THE FAMILY THAT GIVES TOGETHER
 
The Bank of America/ Center on Philanthropy study showed that 70.9 percent of affluent households discuss philanthropy with children, but just 35.2 percent allow children to be involved in the process, and only 23.4 percent set criteria for the children’s participation. Wealth advisor Paul Comstock says that although he does not advocate that every wealthy family form a charitable foundation, those that do should pull all family members into the philanthropic experience—a philosophy that McCombs, Pickens and Blixseth heartily embrace.
Blixseth also gravitates toward pumping his money into charitable organizations with low overhead—such as Habitat for Humanity International. "There are a lot of these charities that mean well, and they’re great charities, but they’ve built such a machine to raise money," he says. "For administration, they end up taking 40 to 45 percent of every dollar just to run their deal."

To circumvent that sort of administration-heavy style, Blixseth often spontaneously gives out of his own pocket. "I like to wildcat it. I like to ferret out the one-off deals where you say, ‘You know what, you have changed one person’s life.’" Unlike Pickens and McCombs, Blixseth’s family does not have a foundation to oversee gift giving. Declining to participate in the trend toward more strategic, planned giving, Blixseth wants to keep his approach to philanthropy rather casual. "The problem is that foundations get too big, unless you’re iron-fisted with the controls and you have an absolute road map of where the money goes," he says. "Pretty soon your family foundation is like these other big 501(c)(3)’s—they’ve got administrators and they’ve got staff, and all of sudden you end up with more time administering than giving."

John Egan is a freelance writer and editor in Austin, Texas.

Additional Information
Advise and Consent
1 | 2 |
Printer Friendly Version  Email a Friend


Related Articles
» 100 Year Plan Part III: The Practice of Charity
» Act Globally
» Laying a Foundation
 
Get a FREE ISSUE and a FREE GIFT

Simply fill out this form to receive a complimentary issue of Worth and a FREE gift ("The top 25 Questions for Your Private Banker"). If you like the magazine, you’ll pay just $36 for 5 more issues (6 in all). If it’s not for you, you can return your invoice marked "cancel", and owe nothing. The FREE issue and FREE gift are yours to keep.
Name
Address
Canadian orders click here
International orders click here

Unsubscribe from subscription emails click here
 



Family Office Wealth Conference